现代东方医学创始人声明
声明人：李霖豪
发布日期：2025 年 8 月 30 日（UTC+8）
我，李霖豪，作为现代东方医学（Modern Oriental Medicine, MOM）的提出者与创始人，郑重声明：MOM 是一套以东方哲学为方法论底层、以“模型（Model）”为基本单元的独立医学体系。它的目标是提供一套清晰、可操作、可验证的路径，用来回答“人体何处失衡”以及“如何恢复秩序”。在语言体系上，MOM 不依附于传统中医（阴阳五行、气血、寸关尺等）、阿育吠陀或其他民族医学，而是摒弃一切难以清晰表述和验证的范畴，以“结构—功能—秩序”的直白语言取代术语堆砌，确保所有判断与操作都能够被教学、复现和核验。
MOM 当前公开的最小模型集包括：功能能量–体液模型，用以建立基于功能能量与体液分区的标准化脉诊流程；反应通路模型，将经络重新定义为功能/能量通路，以编号路径和反应点取代传统经穴；泛全息映射模型，认为耳、手及全身局部均可映射整体，通过敏感点确认并干预，其中桡骨脉区被视为全身缩影界面，用于诊断与治疗；对称映射平衡模型，基于身体左右、前后、上下的对称与映射关系建立替代性调节路径；全局矩阵模型，以整体–局部的矩阵化结构解析人体多层次、多通路的交互与平衡。除此之外，尚有未公开的模型，将随证据积累逐步发布。
MOM 的方法论原则明确且严格：逻辑化，所有判断与操作必须可描述、可推理、可验证；标准化，同案同法，十人复现必须得到一致结论；科学化，以假设—验证—质疑循环为核心，全程留痕可复核；大道至简，以最少的概念解释最大范围的现象；开放演化，模型可根据实践不断新增、精炼或淘汰；并行安全，MOM 可与现代医学并行，尤其在急危重症中必须遵循西医急救规范。
在诊疗实践中，MOM 的流程输出是“症状 → 模型化判定 → 调理路径”，而非病名标签。判定强调分层与分区识别失衡结构，干预则通过选择相应路径进行调理，复核依赖再评估与记录，形成完整的闭环。MOM 不以“病名”作为诊断终点，而是以“结构失衡的模型化判定”为核心结果，并通过统一的教学与考核，确保可复现性与可审计性。
最后，我声明“现代东方医学（MOM）”的体系与命名由我原创提出，此前未见于任何医学出版物或流派。本声明作为首次公开的原创凭证，并作为后续出版与学术工作的引用依据。MOM 的语言体系、判断逻辑与模型均由我独立构建，不依附任何传统民族医学或器官还原论。
Founding Declaration of Modern Oriental Medicine (MOM)
Founder: Li Linhao
Date: August 30, 2025 (UTC+8)
I, Li Linhao, as the originator and founder of Modern Oriental Medicine (MOM), hereby solemnly declare: MOM is an independent medical discipline built upon Oriental philosophy as its methodological foundation, with “Model” as its fundamental unit. Its purpose is to provide a clear, operable, and verifiable framework to answer two fundamental questions: “Where is the imbalance in the human body?” and “How can order be restored?” Unlike Traditional Chinese Medicine (Yin–Yang, Five Elements, Qi–Blood, Cun–Guan–Chi), Ayurveda, or other forms of ethnic medicine, MOM rejects ambiguous and unverifiable categories. It replaces them with the straightforward language of “Structure–Function–Order,” ensuring that all judgments and interventions can be taught, reproduced, and verified.
The current minimal published set of models within MOM includes: the Functional Energy–Liquid Model, which establishes standardized pulse diagnosis based on the partitioning of functional energy and liquid; the Response Pathway Model, which redefines meridians as functional or energetic pathways, replacing traditional acupoints with numbered pathways and response points; the Pan-Holographic Mapping Model, which recognizes ears, hands, and local body regions as holographic reflections of the whole, using sensitivity points for diagnosis and intervention—where the radial artery region serves as a holographic interface for both diagnosis and therapy; the Symmetry Mapping Balance Model, which builds regulatory alternatives through symmetry and mapping relations such as left–right, front–back, and upper–lower; and the Global Matrix Model, which analyzes multilayered, multi-pathway interactions and balance through a whole–part matrix structure. Additional models exist but will be released progressively as evidence accumulates.
The methodological principles of MOM are explicit and rigorous: Logicality, where judgments and operations must be describable, reasoned, and testable; Standardization, ensuring that the same case and same method yield identical conclusions reproducible across ten practitioners; Scientific Process, based on a cycle of hypothesis, verification, and critique with traceable records; Simplicity, employing the fewest possible concepts to explain the widest range of phenomena; Open Evolution, allowing models to be added, refined, or discarded; and Parallel Safety, where MOM is compatible with modern medicine and emergency or critical care strictly follows Western medical protocols.
In practice, the diagnostic and therapeutic process of MOM produces “Symptoms → Model-based judgment → Regulation pathway,” rather than disease labels. Judgment entails layered and sectional recognition of imbalance structures, intervention proceeds by selecting corresponding pathways for regulation, and verification relies on reassessment and record-keeping to form a closed loop. MOM does not treat disease naming as its endpoint; instead, its core lies in the model-based judgment of structural imbalance. Through unified teaching and assessment, consistency, reproducibility, and auditability are ensured.
Finally, I declare that the term “Modern Oriental Medicine (MOM)” and its entire system were originally created by me, with no precedent in any medical literature or school. This declaration constitutes the first public record of originality and shall serve as the reference for future publications and academic work. The language system, logical framework, and models of MOM were independently constructed by me, without reliance on any traditional medicine or reductionist organ-based paradigm.
模型总览
现代东方医学（Modern Oriental Medicine，MOM）是一门以东方哲学的方法论为底层、以“模型”为基本单元的独立医学体系。它既不是传统理论的翻版，也不是西方医学的拼接，而是从底层逻辑出发，重新建立的一门学科。
它的思想渊源可以追溯到东方哲学的整体观。比如，华严宗在《华严经》中提出“微尘含世界”，强调整体寓于部分、部分折射整体，这与现代全息思想中的“整体–部分”高度呼应。道家的生成论，《道德经》里说“道生一，一生二，二生三，三生万物”，层层递推、尺度相似，与分形的自相似原理暗合。现代东方医学从这些哲学启发中汲取灵感，但并不是它们的翻译或附庸，而是独立发展出一套面向现代的学科框架。
在 MOM 中，“模型”不是经验或处方的堆积，而是疗法之上的上层结构。它把纷繁复杂的实践压缩成清晰、可执行的结构接口，规定了观测的边界、操作的可能路径，以及最后判定的逻辑。不同的人可以走不同的技术路线，但最终都会在同一框架下留下清晰可比的记录。升级和优化因此集中在结构和逻辑层面，而不是在某个具体手法上反复打磨。
核心模型
炁能–生液模型（QEL）
将人体划分为功能驱动层与物质体液层，形成能量与物质的双层结构。在这一架构下，无论是脉诊、针刺，还是营养补充，都能找到清晰的解释。“补充、疏导、转化”成为标准化的判断方式，避免陷入模糊的语焉不详。
分形全息方法论（FHM）
以分形与全息映射为思维工具，揭示整体与局部的嵌套关系。分形的递推与全息的对应被整合为诊断与疗法设计的思维框架。于是，面部、背部、腹部、手臂，甚至舌、耳、手指等微小部位，都能够作为整体的缩影来使用，支撑起一整套结构化的逻辑。
全息普适原理（HUP）
任何复杂系统中，整体都会压缩进局部，局部也必然折射整体。这是一条普遍规律，也是所有全息类疗法的基石。它解释了为什么局部信号能够反映全身状态，以及为什么局部干预能产生系统性效应。
泛全息身体映射模型（PHBM）
重构人体的全息对应关系。这里的对应不再是固定点位的死板关系，而是动态可重组的网络。腹部、面部、四肢、舌体等，甚至一些隐蔽部位，都可能成为全息缩影。这个模型打破了传统固定穴位的限制，为针刺、手法、运动和节律训练提供了更灵活的逻辑。
对称映射平衡模型（SMBM）
人体在结构与功能上始终遵循着对称、映射与制衡的规律。左与右、上与下、近端与远端，常常能够互为参照。过去“左病右治、上病下治”的说法，在这个模型中被赋予了结构化的解释。平衡因此不再是抽象的说辞，而是能落到具体操作与评估上的依据。
全局矩阵模型（GMM）
把身体看作一个矩阵，每个单元都可以承载功能或状态。矩阵单元与矩阵文法的方式，能把不同分区和诊断路径统一起来。它能同时表达整体、局部和多层次的交互关系。既能容纳传统的符号体系，也能接纳现代的测量数据，让二者在同一结构下对话。
应用与价值
- 统一语言，将模糊表述转化为可读可写的结构，使经验得以比较与复现。
- 保证可复现，在统一的时间窗和指标下，不同操作者与中心能够得到一致的结论。
- 多路径融合，脉诊、针刺、饮食、运动、呼吸、药物与器械等，都能接入同一框架。
- 可进化，模型采用版本化管理，每次升级带有时间戳和 DOI 证据，保障确权与透明演进。
结语
因此，现代东方医学的模型不是僵死的图表，而是一种活的结构。它们像软件一样，随着证据与应用不断迭代升级。每一次修订和优化，都让医学更进一步走向逻辑化、科学化、标准化。
更重要的是，它们不是旧框架的翻译，而是一次从根基出发的彻底重建。
Overview of Models
Modern Oriental Medicine (MOM) is an independent medical discipline that takes Oriental philosophy as its methodological foundation and uses “models” as its basic units. It is neither a continuation of traditional theories nor a patchwork of Western medicine, but a discipline rebuilt from first principles and structural logic.
The intellectual roots of MOM can be traced to the holistic views in Oriental philosophy. For example, the Huayan school in the Avatamsaka Sutra described that “a speck of dust contains the entire world,” emphasizing that the whole is contained in the part and the part reflects the whole—an idea resonant with modern holographic thinking about “whole–part” relations. In Daoist cosmology, the Dao De Jing states: “Dao gives birth to one, one gives birth to two, two give birth to three, and three give birth to the myriad things.” This recursive generation and scale similarity align closely with the principle of fractal self-similarity. MOM draws inspiration from such philosophical insights, but it is not a translation or derivative of them. Instead, it has independently developed into a modern academic framework.
In MOM, a “model” is not a collection of experiences or prescriptions, but a higher-level structure above therapies. It compresses complex practices into clear and executable structural interfaces, defining observational boundaries, possible operational pathways, and final decision logics. Practitioners may choose different technical routes, but their outcomes remain comparable within the same framework. Upgrades and optimizations therefore concentrate on structure and logic, rather than endlessly refining a single technique.
Core Models
Qi–Energy and Liquid Model (QEL)
The human body is divided into a functional–energetic layer and a material–liquid layer, forming a dual structure of energy and matter. Within this framework, pulse diagnosis, acupuncture, and nutritional supplementation can all be consistently explained. “Replenish, channel, and transform” become standardized decision criteria, avoiding vague and ambiguous terminology.
Fractal Holographic Methodology (FHM)
Fractals and holography are used as cognitive tools to reveal the nested relationship between whole and part. Recursive fractals and holographic correspondences are integrated into a framework for diagnosis and therapy design. Thus, regions such as the face, back, abdomen, arms, and even smaller parts like the tongue, ear, or fingers can serve as holographic reflections of the whole body, supporting a structured and coherent logic.
Holographic Universal Principle (HUP)
In any complex system, the whole is compressed into the part, and the part inevitably reflects the whole. This universal principle underpins all holographic-based therapies, explaining why local signals can reflect systemic conditions and why local interventions can generate systemic effects.
Pan-Holographic Body Mapping Model (PHBM)
This model reconstructs the body’s holographic correspondences. Instead of fixed one-to-one point relations, it describes a dynamic and reconfigurable mapping network. The abdomen, face, limbs, tongue, and even less obvious body areas can serve as holographic reflections. By breaking the limitations of fixed acupoints, it provides more flexible logic for acupuncture, manual therapy, movement, and rhythm training.
Symmetry Mapping Balance Model (SMBM)
The human body consistently follows principles of symmetry, mapping, and counterbalance in both structure and function. Left and right, upper and lower, proximal and distal regions often correspond to one another. The traditional expression “treat the left for illness on the right, treat the lower for illness on the upper” here gains a structured and logical explanation. Balance is no longer an abstract notion but a concrete basis for operation and evaluation.
Global Matrix Model (GMM)
The body is viewed as a matrix, with each unit capable of carrying functions or states. Through “matrix units and matrix grammar,” different regions and diagnostic pathways can be unified. This model can simultaneously express whole, part, and multi-level interactions. It accommodates traditional symbolic systems while also integrating modern measurement data, allowing both traditions and modern science to communicate within a single structure.
Applications and Value
- Unified language – turning vague expressions into readable and writable structures, making experience comparable and reproducible.
- Reproducibility – under unified time windows and indicators, different practitioners and centers can reach consistent conclusions.
- Multi-pathway integration – pulse diagnosis, acupuncture, diet, exercise, breathing, pharmacology, and devices can all be accessed through the same input–output framework.
- Evolvability – versioned management ensures that each upgrade is time-stamped and optionally linked with DOI evidence, securing authorship and transparent development.
Conclusion
MOM’s models are not static diagrams but living structures. They evolve like software, continuously updated through evidence and application. Each revision and optimization brings medicine further toward logic, scientific rigor, and standardization.
More importantly, these models are not translations of old frameworks, but a complete reconstruction from the ground up.
在现代医学框架下定义现代东方医学
现代东方医学（MOM）不是传统的翻译，也不是现代还原论医学的附属，它本质上是现代医学体系中的一个独立分支。
它的特点在于：以“模型”为核心，每一个模型都可以独立命名为一门“医学”，例如炁能–生液医学、全局矩阵医学、对称映射平衡医学等。命名不是包装，而是确立了 MOM 在现代医学框架中的学科身份。
这样一来，MOM 不再需要借助传统术语来证明自己，也无需依附于现代还原论医学的学科体系。它有自己的命名、逻辑和方法，可以在现代科学的条件下被验证、被复现、被发展。
因此，MOM 不是桥梁，而是一门从根基重建的新医学。它天然属于现代医学，只是以“东方哲学的启发 + 现代科学的语言”作为出发点。
Defining Modern Oriental Medicine within the Framework of Modern Medicine
Modern Oriental Medicine (MOM) is neither a translation of traditional theories nor a subsidiary of modern reductionist medicine. In essence, it stands as an independent branch within the framework of modern medicine.
Its defining feature lies in taking the “model” as its core unit. Each model can be independently named as a distinct “medicine” — for example, Qi–Liquid Medicine, Global Matrix Medicine, or Symmetry Mapping Balance Medicine. Such naming is not mere packaging; it establishes MOM’s disciplinary identity within modern medical science.
In this way, MOM no longer needs to rely on traditional terminology for legitimacy, nor does it depend on the disciplinary framework of modern reductionist medicine. It possesses its own naming system, logic, and methodology, all of which can be tested, reproduced, and developed under modern scientific conditions.
Therefore, MOM is not a bridge between traditions, but a new medicine rebuilt from the ground up. It naturally belongs to modern medicine, while taking “inspiration from Eastern philosophy + the language of modern science” as its point of departure.
公开存档 · DOI & ORCID
以下为已公开的部分 DOI；完整清单与后续更新请见 ORCID 统一入口。
统一入口 / ORCID：
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2602-7762